I haven’t posted in a long time, I know. The politics and whatnot of LMAS just became so drab and convoluted that I faded out and focused on volunteering (or my actual job). We’ve since appointed a new director, Justin Scally, who has made some minor good changes I guess (like putting up barriers between kennels to reduce spread of disease), but we’re still waiting to see if he’s going to do any huge long-term good. Still doesn’t look like we’re going to be no-kill anytime soon, what a shocker. I know that being a government-run facility we have a LOT holding us back like… well, the government. We have much less freedom than an independent shelter would have, I’m not sure how many folks realize that.
I guess what really brings my post today is an article on “The Ville Voice” written by a fellow called Jake. He has a history of writing articles slamming LMAS, which is fine. I’ve agreed with his articles in the past, but vaguely paid attention until now. I would have no problem with him writing articles bashing LMAS… if he were any good at it. He comes across very much as a 17-year-old, testosterone-riddled jock who just sputters whatever rant pops into his head. He forgets important things a real, half-decent “journalist” who “digs up corruption and incompetence” should have such as, y’know, integrity and knowledge. He clearly fails to research the things he writes about. Here is the article in question: http://thevillevoice.com/2011/12/14/lmas-stories-now-actually-write-themselves/comment-page-1/#comment-272990
He snuggles up with several fallacies including sweeping generalizations, begging the question, dismissals, and most childishly of all, ad hominem. You know, those things that have no place in knowledgeable debate. He is very much one of those “this is my opinion and it’s right, so shut up” types. You know the kind. The ones who stubbornly stew in their own boiling pot, fearing to open their mind and accept what others have to say because god forbid he be wrong or ignorant of something. He can’t be. He knows everything. Right?
Maybe I’m missing the point of his article entirely. Maybe, as he says, it really is just a place for him to post his opinion, facts or no, with no constructive discussion? But isn’t that what a blog, like this, is for? Man, maybe I should get into journalism – it’s obviously way easier than I thought. I just have to be able to type words I think!
But if it really is just a place for him to vent, why doesn’t he just disallow comments altogether? He allows his one good buddy “Rosebuds” to comment, and takes a few of the other comments (most of which agree with him, of course), but once one too many people crawl out of the woodwork who have – gasp – a differing opinion (and more relevant experience) than him, well, we can’t have that. So their comments are deleted. I’m pretty sure that’s listed in a Top 5 Childish Moves list somewhere. It should be, anyway. Act like an adult and hear what other people have to say too. Or at least let their comments go approved so the commentors can bicker and discuss amongst themselves while you ignore it all and stick to your opinion. Whatever. I just really don’t see the point here. If you really just wanted to rant you’d have a quiet little blog like this one. You put yourself out there as some sort of actual media source (don’t bullshit yourself, you do) and feed the public ignorant information. You say you don’t care, but the mere fact you cherry pick the comments so tediously and get defensive proves otherwise, moron.
I called him out, asking what experience he has with LMAS, but he has repeatedly failed to answer. I guess he is too much of an internet tough guy who doesn’t care, man. I did look at his profile and his Twitter. Apparently his only credentials are “geek” and that he’s written stuff for some other outlets and I guess some politicians read his stuff or something, I dunno. The bottom line is he’s just a geek who writes his opinion. You know, that thing millions of people are/do every day. He has no apparent experience volunteering or working with a shelter. Hearsay doesn’t count, cowboy. Just read the comments for yourself. What you’re not seeing the comments I tried to add but were deleted. Here is what I tried to add:
“First of all, Rosebuds, some of that “shit you could find w a simple google search” is inaccurate bullshit. I would NOT want anyone to learn about something as complicated as canine behavior via whatever random crap pops up in a simple Google search. Also, these classes are led by Ashley of Slugger City Bully Buddies who I have found to be very knowledgeable. I trust her advice (plus she’s just finished a degree in training and is working on a vet tech degree as well).
Second, yes, pets and kids should be at home first time around (like ANY trainer will make you do). Any training anywhere is about educating the owner first and foremost about behavior and to properly implement training techniques. I do think they should make an exception for the parents that simply can’t make babysitting arrangements because them getting into the class and learning is ultimately more important than whether their kids are there being bored or distracting. Ideally they would have the owners later bring in the dogs to supervise interactions and see where problems may lie, but LMAS has only so many resources and this class’s main focus is education (which is a huge priority).
Jake, that doesn’t tell us much. I have TONS of experience with my car. I operate it every day. But that doesn’t mean I could tell you the first thing about how it works. Michael Vick has a lot of experience with animals, but you sure as hell wouldn’t trust any advice from him would you? I’m not saying that means Rosebuds has no valid credentials, but at this point, they’re still unknown.
I’m with Jeff on this one. Why the hell are so many people attacking a knowledgeable person’s attempt to educate the public? Is it a perfect execution? No. But would you rather we continue to sit on our asses and twiddle our thumbs as ignorant owners keep surrendering their dogs due to easily-solved issues that this class is trying to help with?”
Several people in the local animal community (whether they are involved with LMAS, KHS, SCBB, etc.) agreed with me completely. Jake claims me and those who disagreed with him were off having a Justin Scally circle jerk, even though none of us really mentioned the guy. I think he’s a little more hung up on him than we are. Man this felt exactly like internet flame wars I’d have when I was about 14. Ahhh… Also what the hell does “queened out” mean? Is that some sort of poorly executed slur against the drag community? Childish, ignorant, stubborn, AND a potential bigoted douchebag – what can’t this guy do?!